Back to all podcasts

Episode 0068

Summary

The audio features an intense debate between two speakers. Speaker 1 presents research and data to support a theory, which Speaker 2 vehemently refutes, citing flaws in methodology and data collection. The argument quickly devolves into a heated, repetitive disagreement about whether the chicken or the egg came first, with both speakers expressing anger.

00:00 00:00

Transcript (Click timestamp to jump)

00:06 Speaker 1

We've been over this a thousand times. The data is irrefutable. Look, we've done extensive research, built studies and read the literature, and there is conclusive evidence to support my theory.

00:18 Speaker 2

Horowitz, I beg to differ. Even in your most recent study, the investigative approach was flawed. You know as well as I do, the collection of data was not systematic and there's a large margin of error. To draw a definitive conclusion based on that data would be misleading.

00:35 Speaker 1

That is preposterous!

00:37 Speaker 2

You are trying to single-handedly solve one of the world's greatest mysteries and yet, you're oblivious to the fact that you're wrong.

00:44 Speaker 1

I'm not wrong. The chicken came first.

00:47 Speaker 2

No, the egg came first.

00:49 Speaker 1

The chicken.

00:50 Speaker 2

Egg.

00:51 Speaker 1

The chicken.

00:51 Speaker 2

The egg!

00:52 Speaker 1

The chicken.

00:53 Speaker 2

The egg!