Episode 0094
Summary
Two speakers discuss a physics class where the topic was the creation of the universe. Speaker 2 is annoyed and skeptical, calling it religious and questioning the Big Bang theory. Speaker 1 defends scientific theories, explaining the concept of matter creation and citing Edwin Hubble's contributions, emphasizing that a theory undergoes rigorous testing, much to Speaker 2's continued frustration.
Transcript (Click timestamp to jump)
What's up? You don't look too good.
Yeah, my head hurts, that's all. I've been in physics class all day. It's killer.
I liked physics, it's all math really, arcs, curves, velocity, cool stuff.
Yeah, yeah. But today's lesson was all about the creation of the universe.
A physics class about the creation of the universe? That's some pretty unscientific language there. Sounds more religious to me.
It's all religion! Take the theory of the Big Bang. How is it possible that all of this stuff in the universe comes from an explosion?
That's no better than Atlas carrying the globe on his back or African myths about turtles and stuff.
Turtles? Whatever. Look, all that's required for the creation of matter is an imbalance of particles and antiparticles. At least, that's what the math says.
Math, schmath! What's the evidence?
There is evidence. You know Edwin Hubble, the guy who in the early 20th century was the first scientist to measure the drift of matter in the universe.
Thus advancing notions of an expanding universe. What would it be expanding from? Well, the Big Bang, duh.
Anyway, it's just a theory. Why do people go around touting theories? Where's the rigor in that?
Dude, don't equivocate. A theory only becomes a theory after withstanding rigorous testing. You slept through class, didn't you?
Uh, you're making my head hurt again. Quit with the questions.
Summary
The audio features hosts Marco and Erica discussing physics, specifically the Big Bang theory, and reviewing related vocabulary. It includes a dialogue between two other speakers (Speaker 3 and Speaker 4) who debate the scientific validity and religious implications of the Big Bang theory, with Speaker 3 finding it frustrating and Speaker 4 defending it with scientific arguments. The hosts then explain key physics terms like "matter," "particles," "antiparticles," and "drift of matter," followed by a breakdown of various idiomatic expressions and slang from the dialogue, such as "thus advancing notions," "tout," "rigor/rigorous," "equivocate," "math shmath," and "duh." The discussion also touches upon the controversial nature of the Big Bang theory in education.
Transcript (Click timestamp to jump)
(Music)
Hello English learners, welcome back to another lesson with us here at English Pod. My name is Marco.
And I'm Erica.
And today we're going to be talking about physics.
That's right. An advanced lesson for all you physics lovers out there. And even for those of you who maybe don't love physics so much, there's still some great language here.
Right. We're going to be talking about the Big Bang Theory. A very popular theory of how the universe or the world and how we came upon being created.
That's right. So we've got some physics language, but we've also got some really tough words that I bet many of our users have never seen before, which we're going to look at those in this lesson.
All right, so why don't we get started with this great and interesting lesson and let's listen to the dialogue for the first time.
(Music)
What's up? You don't look too good.
Yeah, my head hurts, that's all. I've been in physics class all day. It's killer.
I like physics. It's all math really. Arcs, curves, velocity, cool stuff.
Yeah, yeah. But today's lesson was all about the creation of the universe.
A physics class about the creation of the universe? That's some pretty unscientific language there. It sounds more religious to me.
It's all religion. Take the theory of the Big Bang. How is it possible that all of the stuff in the universe comes from an explosion? That's no better than Atlas carrying the globe on his back or African myths about turtles and stuff.
Turtles? Whatever. Look, all that's required for the creation of matter is an imbalance of particles and antiparticles. At least that's what the math says.
Math, shmath. What's the evidence?
There is evidence. You know Edwin Hubble, the guy who in the early 20th century was the first scientist to measure the drift of matter in the universe, thus advancing notions of an expanding universe.
What would it be expanding from? Well, the Big Bang, duh.
Anyway, it's just a theory. Why do people go around touting theories? Where is the rigor in that?
Dude, don't equivocate. A theory only becomes a theory after withstanding rigorous testing. You slept through class, didn't you?
Uh, you're making my head hurt again. Quit with the questions.
(Music)
Well, it sure does sound like a difficult class, doesn't it?
It's a very interesting topic and very controversial, so there are many opinions on it. But before we get into that, why don't we take a look at some of those physics related words that we listened to in Language Takeaway.
(Music)
Language takeaway.
We've got four words we've heard in the dialogue that are all related to physics. So let's start with the first one, which is matter.
Matter.
Matter.
Okay, so you probably know this word from what's the matter? What's wrong?
Right. Yep.
In this case, we're talking about matter, so anything that occupies space, that has a mass, or that is related to energy. So, matter.
So all things in the world are made up of matter, right?
Exactly.
Okay.
Now, let's move on to another one.
Particles.
Particles. Particles.
Now, particles are a little bit more Now particles are a little bit easier. They're just very small pieces of a whole.
An apple is made up of apple particles?
Something like that. You can if you want to understand it easily, yeah, you apple has many small particles that make up the apple.
So, like, let's paint a picture here. Imagine you've got a beach, and all the pieces of sand are particles of the beach.
Exactly, very good. So those are particles.
Now, the next one is a little bit difficult for me. I don't understand this. Antiparticles.
All right, so antiparticles.
Antiparticles.
Now, this this prefix anti. It means something that is against, right?
Right. And I've seen this one in anti-clockwise.
All right, so antiparticles are those that are against particles. So basically if you have a particle that has a positive charge and another one comes in with a negative charge in the same weight and the same type of particle, if they get together, they cancel each other out and they both die.
Oh.
So that's an antiparticle.
All right, well, you heard it first here at English Pod.
So antiparticles are not a good thing to have around.
Now, we also heard them talk about the drift of matter.
Right, drift of matter.
Drift of matter.
Also sometimes called drift of dark matter.
Okay, well, I know the verb to drift, right? To sort of float away on the sea.
Right. If you have a little ship, you leave it on the beach, it'll drift away. It'll go slowly away.
Yep. But what about drift of matter?
So basically the drift of matter is this residue, the remains of the Big Bang, of the explosion.
Okay.
So, matter and radiation keeps on drifting through the universe.
So it's moving slowly through the universe.
Moving slowly. So this big explosion and just consider it to be like this ripple. And it's expanding and expanding. That's the drift of matter.
Well, I learned something else today.
Some very specific words related to physics, but it's very interesting. Once you get into reading about these things, it will help you to understand it better.
That's right. But we've also got some non-physics related language that we want to look at now in Language Takeaway, part two.
(Music)
Language takeaway.
So they were talking about the drift of matter and how it's drifting through the universe. And then he said, thus advancing the notions of an expanding universe.
So I want to look at the phrase, thus advancing notions.
Thus advancing notions.
Okay, let's start with the first word here, thus.
Okay, so this is a good connector.
A conjunction.
A conjunction. And basically it means Therefore.
Therefore.
Therefore, or in consequence, right?
Yep. So, thus advancing notions. Now, notions are ideas.
Right.
And so when you advance notions or advance ideas, you help them make progress. You help them go forward and become known.
Okay. So, in order to understand this in the context, they are saying that the drift of matter thus advances notions of an expanding universe. So it is making progress to people believing that the universe is getting bigger.
Okay, so interesting phrase. Now, I really like this word thus and a lot of people are afraid to use it. So why don't we hear a few examples of how it's used in context.
(Music)
Example one.
So you can see that we've studied the fossil record and thus we can conclude that evolution is a fact.
Example two.
He broke severe company policies, thus we had to fire him.
Example three.
I did not receive the documents on time, thus I was unable to send them to you.
All right, good examples of thus, and I guess now we can use it a little bit better.
That's right. Now let's move on to our next word. So, they were talking about people who go around touting theories.
Tout.
To tout.
Okay, so what what does this mean tout?
Well, basically, when you tout something, you talk about it in a positive way, so as to almost like sell that thing.
Okay.
So, for example, we can say, the company is touting the many benefits of its product.
Okay, very good. So to talk positively about something.
Yeah, with the idea of trying to sell that thing or make people buy into it or believe it.
All right, very good. What about our next word?
Well, we heard two related words in the dialogue. They were talking about where's the rigor in these theories and rigorous testing.
Okay, so what's the difference between rigor and rigorous?
Rigor is the state of being very clear and careful and exact.
Okay.
And rigorous is just the adjective, clear, careful, attention to detail and exact.
Okay, very good. So rigorous training.
I'm going over my notes in rigorous detail.
Okay, very good. And now we have one more word today in language takeaway, and that is equivocate.
So we heard, dude, don't equivocate.
Don't equivocate.
Don't equivocate.
All right, so what what does she what does he mean by this?
Well, when you equivocate, you use big words to try and mislead somebody.
Okay, so using big words to confuse or to mislead.
Yep. So for example, we could say, the job can we could say, when asked about his experience, the job candidate equivocated.
Okay.
Or even the presidential nominee did not equivocate when he explained his tax policy.
All right, so some good examples, good phrases, a lot of interesting stuff and a little bit more educational podcast today.
That's right. So let's continue with our education by listening to the dialogue one last time.
(Music)
What's up? You don't look too good.
Yeah, my head hurts, that's all. I've been in physics class all day. It's killer.
I liked physics. It's all math really. Arcs, curves, velocity, cool stuff.
Yeah, yeah. But today's lesson was all about the creation of the universe.
A physics class about the creation of the universe? That's some pretty unscientific language there. It sounds more religious to me.
It's all religion. Take the theory of the Big Bang. How is it possible that all of the stuff in the universe comes from an explosion? That's no better than Atlas carrying the globe on his back or African myths about turtles and stuff.
Turtles? Whatever. Look, all that's required for the creation of matter is an imbalance of particles and antiparticles. At least that's what the math says.
Math, shmath. What's the evidence?
There is evidence. You know Edwin Hubble, the guy who in the early 20th century was the first scientist to measure the drift of matter in the universe, thus advancing notions of an expanding universe.
What would it be expanding from? Well, the Big Bang, duh.
Anyway, it's just a theory. Why do people go around touting theories? Where is the rigor in that?
Dude, don't equivocate. A theory only becomes a theory after withstanding rigorous testing. You slept through class, didn't you?
Uh, you're making my head hurt again. Quit with the questions.
All right, so the Big Bang Theory, very controversial. In some schools in the United States, they have prohibited the teachers from teaching it.
I know, which is seems quite interesting to me, but it is it is actually very controversial and people can get really, really upset about this in America.
So it is an interesting topic. Take it from the point of view of just something else, maybe just to learn a little bit more about this topic such as physics, right?
Right. But there's something that is uncontroversial that I did want to talk about now that we heard in the dialogue. There's a lot of really interesting sort of slang words here in the dialogue, isn't there?
Yeah, we heard in the first part of the dialogue when he said, I've been in physics class all day, killer.
Killer.
So what does he mean by killer?
Oh, he's he's just basically saying it's really hard. You know, it's like it's so difficult that it's murderous.
It was intense.
Yeah. But this word we can use positively as well, can't we?
Yeah, I guess you could say that was a killer party.
Yeah, killer moves on the dance floor.
Okay.
Another interesting thing is that he said, math, shmath.
Now, shmath isn't really a word.
No, but this is a really common structure we use in English when we want to sort of take away from the importance of an idea.
Okay, so you're saying it's not important, I don't care about it or it's not worth it.
Yeah. So, for example, I'm on a diet.
Right. And I would say diet, shmiet.
Yeah.
So basically, the structure is just added s h and then just kind of make it rhyme. Shmiet or like, um.
Like work shmurk.
Yeah, work shmurk or something like that. So you're just making fun of it and you're taking away importance.
Yeah. That's a pretty pretty neat phrase. And one one more. Um, we heard them say, duh.
Duh.
So, when we say this, we're just saying like, you should know this, stupid.
Yeah, this is obvious.
Yeah.
It's kind of making fun of the person or just saying it's so obvious, how can you not know it? And it always goes either at the beginning or at the end of a sentence.
Yeah. So, duh, Marco, we're we're recording a podcast.
Right. Very good. So some great words and phrases in this dialogue and a little bit of slang as well, so you can use it maybe with your friends.
That's right. Um, if you have any questions about the language in this dialogue or any thoughts on physics or the Big Bang Theory, come and check out our website at EnglishPod.com.
All right, we'll see you guys there and until next time.
Goodbye.
(Music)
Summary
This audio features a vocabulary review session. It begins with instructions for listening to definitions and then stating the vocabulary word. A male speaker introduces terms, and a female speaker provides their definitions, covering words related to science (e.g., Big Bang, matter, particle, black hole, astronomy, entropy, singularity, paradox) and general concepts (e.g., What's up, killer, theory, imbalance, notion, rigor, equivocate, withstand). The session repeats some definitions at a faster pace. The latter part of the audio provides example sentences for various words, demonstrating their usage in context.
Transcript (Click timestamp to jump)
The English Pod audio review.
Listen to the meaning, then say the vocabulary word.
What is happening: an informal greeting.
What's up.
Something that is extremely difficult to deal with or withstand.
Killer.
A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena.
Theory.
The theory that a cosmic explosion caused the origin of the universe.
Big Bang.
The substance of which something is made: material.
Matter.
The situation where there is an unequal amount of different things.
Imbalance.
Any one tiny part of matter.
Particle.
A particle that has the same mass as another particle but has opposite values for its other properties.
Antiparticle.
Ideas or concepts.
Notion.
A state of something being very exact.
Rigor.
Use vague language so as to deceive someone.
Equivocate.
Surviving a difficult experience or trouble.
Withstand.
The scientific study of matter in outer space, especially the positions, dimensions, distribution, motion, composition, energy, and evolution of celestial bodies and phenomenon.
Astronomy.
A region of space resulting from the collapse of a star with extremely high gravitational field.
Black hole.
A small, faint, very dense star.
White dwarf.
The tendency of all matter and energy in the universe to evolve toward a state of inert uniformity.
Entropy.
A point of infinite density and infinitesimal volume at which space and time become infinitely distorted, according to the theory of general relativity.
Singularity.
A seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true.
Paradox.
Let's try that faster.
The substance of which something is made: material.
Matter.
Surviving a difficult experience or trouble.
Withstand.
Use vague language so as to deceive someone.
Equivocate.
A particle that has the same mass as another particle but has opposite values for its other properties.
Antiparticle.
Any one tiny part of matter.
Particle.
The situation where there is an unequal amount of different things.
Imbalance.
A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena.
Theory.
The scientific study of matter in outer space, especially the positions, dimensions, distribution, motion, composition, energy, and evolution of celestial bodies and phenomenon.
Astronomy.
A point of infinite density and infinitesimal volume at which space and time become infinitely distorted, according to the theory of general relativity.
Singularity.
A small, faint, very dense star.
White dwarf.
The theory that a cosmic explosion caused the origin of the universe.
Big Bang.
A seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true.
Paradox.
What is happening: an informal greeting.
What's up.
Ideas or concepts.
Notion.
The tendency of all matter and energy in the universe to evolve toward a state of inert uniformity.
Entropy.
Something that is extremely difficult to deal with or withstand.
Killer.
A state of something being very exact.
Rigor.
A region of space resulting from the collapse of a star with extremely high gravitational field.
Black hole.
Now say the word and hear it in a sentence.
So you can see that we've studied the fossil record, and thus, we can conclude that evolution is a fact.
He broke severe company policies, thus, we had to fire him.
I did not receive the documents on time, thus, I was unable to send them to you.
But we examined the data rigorously. How can there be an error? It's simply not possible.
Don't worry, the nuclear reactor went through rigorous testing, so we can be sure that it is safe.
She is a professor who is known for her scientific rigor.
The dieting experts are touting the benefits of the latest weight loss program, but I think it's just a fad.
This drug is being touted as a miracle cure.
The release of the much-touted web browser will revolutionize the way you use the internet.
Equivocate.
When asked about his plan for cutting taxes, the presidential candidate did not equivocate.
Equivocate.
In the interview, when I asked him about why he left his last job, he started to equivocate.
Equivocate.
Stop equivocating. Tell me clearly what you mean.
Notion.
Where did you get this notion that the sun travels around the earth?
Notion.
Scientists are advancing the notion that socialization plays a role in language learning.
Notion.
That's an absurd notion. It's absolutely not true.